Sources of election
Those intent on committing election fraud
prefer ballot tampering
techniques rather than miscounting
techniques, because ballot tampering destroys the original evidence
while miscounting preserves the original evidence. Miscounting techniques
are used when ballot tampering and other techniques that have a permanent
affect and destroy evidence have failed to yield sufficient fraudulent
votes to steal the election.
POLL CLOSE FRAUD
Recruit and encourage those who are ineligible
to vote, including illegal aliens, convicted felons, and mentally ill and
Register and vote in the name of multiple
non-existent persons, or dead persons.
Delaying or removing absentee ballots in the
Delaying or removing campaign literature and
organization news publications with voter recommendations in the mail stream.
WITH BALLOTS WHILE IN STORAGE OR DURING MANUAL HAND RECOUNTS
Addition of new, fraudulent ballots to the
Removal of legitimate ballots that are voted
for the opposition candidate.
Marking a new vote choice (i.e., punching
new hole) on a paper ballot where no vote choice was made for a
specific office, such as President. Such a non-voted office is in effect
a vote for "none of the above", due to voter dissatisfaction, indecision,
Marking a new vote choice (i.e., punching
new hole) on a paper ballot where a vote choice was made for a specific
office, such as President. Such an extra mark or hole creates an ambiguity
for that office, and the ballot is considered a "spoiled" invalid ballot
as far as that office is concerned. This has the effect of subtracting
one vote for the opposition candidate for each ballot that contained a
vote for that candidate and which is "double-punched" during election fraud
BALLOTS DURING MACHINE COUNTS OR MANUAL HAND RECOUNTS
Interpreting and counting "dimpled chads"
and "pregnant chads" for the supported candidate and ignoring such chads
for the opposition candidate, even though such chads are not legally counted
as votes anywhere in the U.S.
Intentionally miscounting ballots during manual
counts, such as placing ballots in piles for the wrong candidate, inserting
errors into tally sheets, etc.
Intentionally not counting selected stacks
or groups of ballots from election precincts or counties that would yield
more votes for the opposition candidate than the supported candidate.
Intentionally not counting overseas
absentee ballots from U.S. military men and women who vote predominantly
Republican and who have suffered greatly reduced moral under the Clinton-Gore
Feeding stacks of ballots that would yield
higher vote counts for the supported candidate through the counting machine
more than once.
Performing manual re-counts of only carefully
selected high yield precincts for the supported candidate, based on voter
registration/party affiliation, voter turn-out, and historical and traditional
vote distribution between the different parties. By failing to re-count
entire counties or an entire state, "new found votes" are obtained in disproportionately
larger numbers for the supported candidate than for the opposition candidate.
(This is why it is a good idea to have a state or federal law that requires
that any manual re-counts must cover entire counties or an entire state.
Florida has such a law.)
Using inaccurate and biased samples and extrapolation
of those samples to claim that a manual re-count would change the result
of the election. For example, sample only high yield precincts for the
supported candidate, and then extrapolate the numbers of "new found votes"
for each candidate to "represent" the entire county, without applying appropriate
weight factors (multipliers) to account for differences in voter registration/party
affiliation, voter turn-out, and historical and traditional vote distribution
between the different parties. During a county-wide manual hand re-count,
there is more handling of the actual ballots, and more opportunity to commit
PROCESS OF SYSTEMATIC ELECTION FRAUD
Continuing the election fraud activities,
including repeated manual hand-recounts, until sufficient fraudulent votes
have been obtained for the supported candidate to change the outcome of
the election. In the case of the 2000 Presidential Election, the Gore-Lieberman
campaign and the Democrat Party used an iterative process that would not
end until they either obtain enough fraudulent votes to switch the outcome
of the election, or they run out of time based on statutory deadlines and
Accuse opposition of committing election fraud
to divert attention from the real election fraud and to put the opposition
on the defensive to suppress any real and legitimate charges of election
fraud. This will also create a false belief that the opposition candidate
is an illegitimate candidate and and illegitimate office holder should
the number of fraudulent votes be insufficient to steal the election. This
false belief will hinder the opposition candidate from being as effective
a public official, and will make it easier to defeat that opponent and
other candidates from the opposition party in the next election.
Get the news media
and entertainment industry involved as enthusiastic willing accomplices
to publicize these false accusations without doing any competent or honest
fact checking, research, or presentation of balancing information.